The End of Blind Faith in Foreign Policy: Why Isn’t Unilateral Commitment in Our National Interest?

Date:

785 Megosztás 🔥 Valós idejű közösségi interakciók

Utolsó frissítés: 2026.05.28. — Szerző: Anti-Propaganda News Blog

Neokohn-

„It is in Hungary’s national interest to be a friend of Israel,” said the representative from Tisza

Original article: Here

The article and the topic it raises shed light on another important, often overlooked aspect: in order to pursue a truly balanced and fair foreign policy, it is essential that we also take the other side of the conflict into account.

Among the domestic political elite—whether it be the government or newly emerging political forces—there is a strange, almost dogmatic consensus: it is in Hungary’s interest to align itself unconditionally and uncritically with the current policies of the State of Israel. Most recently, a representative of the Tisza Party was quick to assert that Hungary „must be a friend of Israel,” continuing a tradition that shapes foreign policy not on the basis of rational interests, but on an emotional basis.
It is time to say it: this approach is misguided, short-sighted, and runs completely counter to Hungary’s true national interest, which—even in the Middle East—should be based on balance, not one-sidedness.

1. „Friendship” is not the same as the national interest

In international relations, there are no eternal friendships, only eternal interests. When a Hungarian politician declares that our country must behave as a „friend” toward a Middle Eastern state that is constantly embroiled in regional wars, he voluntarily gives up Hungarian diplomacy’s room to maneuver.
It is not Hungary’s role to take sides with one party or another in the conflicts of the Middle East, but rather to stay out of them and maintain its position as a mediator and advocate for peace.

2. Human rights and the principle of Palestinian self-determination

If Hungary truly stands on the ground of international law and justice, it cannot turn a blind eye to the decades-long tragedy of the Palestinian people and their legitimate aspirations for self-determination. Lasting peace in the Middle East—which is also the key to Europe’s security—is inconceivable without a just, two-state solution to the Palestinian question.
The suffering of Palestinian civilians, the humanitarian crisis, and the complicit silence regarding human rights violations are not only morally troubling but also undermine Hungary’s diplomatic credibility. A proud, sovereign European nation must be capable of showing empathy and support for Palestinians who yearn for freedom and their own state, rather than unilaterally aiding in their oppression.

3. The danger of European and global isolation

It must be recognized that the Israeli government’s current military strategy and political course are creating serious tensions even within the Western alliance system. Washington and a significant portion of the European Union’s member states are also increasingly demanding the recognition of Palestinian statehood and compliance with international law. If Hungarian policy reflexively and uncritically defends a single actor in international forums, it will once again force Hungary into an isolated, maverick position.

4. Economic Realism and Global Relations

Hungary is an open, export-oriented economy for which maintaining good relations with the Arab world and the countries of the Global South is of vital interest. For these countries, the Palestinian cause is sacred and inviolable. Unilateral Israeli commitments could close doors that should remain open for the benefit of the Hungarian economy. A pragmatic foreign policy must seek economic benefit and stability, rather than jumping into trenches chosen on ideological grounds.

Conclusion

The Tisza Party’s statement proves that the new generation of politicians is falling into the same trap as the old one: foreign policy is driven not by cold, hard Hungarian interests and universal human values, but by a scramble for international recognition.
Hungary must not be a staunch supporter of one side or the other in the Middle East, but rather a **mediator for peace and justice**. Fair, bilateral relations with Israel are necessary, but it is equally important to respect and support the rights of the Palestinian people. The national interest lies in independence and fairness, not subservience.

785 Megosztás 🔥 Valós idejű közösségi interakciók

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

Please leave a review!
Enter your name here


spot_imgspot_img

Subscribe

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Abban a pillanatban, amikor egy emberi élet „járulékos veszteséggé” válik

A „NAZA” láthatóvá teszi azt, amit Gázából soha nem...

„Folyamatos népirtás Palesztina ellen”: Ramaphosa elszámoltathatóságot követel a BRICS-országoktól.

Cyril Ramaphosa dél-afrikai elnök a Nemzetközi Bíróságon követelte a...

Koszovónak nemzetközi jogra volt szüksége a fennmaradáshoz. Most segít Izraelnek megkerülni azt Gázában.

Pristina kockázatos befektetése Trumppal és Izraellel komoly erkölcsi és...

Izraeli robbantások fenyegetik az iskolákat és az otthonokat Masafer Yatta környékén.

A diákok megfogadták, hogy folytatják a tanulást, miközben a...