{"id":2612,"date":"2026-06-11T06:31:28","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T04:31:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/?p=2612"},"modified":"2026-06-11T06:31:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T04:31:28","slug":"az-ensz-gittegylet-vagy-az-igazsag-szava-amikor-a-media-a-sajat-erdekei-szerint-alakitja-a-valosagot-neokohn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/az-ensz-gittegylet-vagy-az-igazsag-szava-amikor-a-media-a-sajat-erdekei-szerint-alakitja-a-valosagot-neokohn\/","title":{"rendered":"The UN: \u201eA Club\u201d or the Voice of Truth? \u2013 When the Media Shapes Reality to Suit Its Own Interests (Neokohn)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-path-to-node=\"3\"><b data-path-to-node=\"3\" data-index-in-node=\"0\">When a report from an international organization is released, the media reacts in one of two ways: either it celebrates it as a \u201evictory for international law\u201d or it brands it as a \u201ebiased club.\u201d The decisive factor, however, is rarely the content of the report, but rather whose interests it serves. This is how the UN transforms overnight from an institution of the devil into the seat of credible truth-tellers.<\/b><\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"4\">Recently, the <a href=\"https:\/\/neokohn.hu\/2026\/06\/10\/ensz-jelentes-hamasz-gaza-onkenyes-kivegzesekveres-kinzas-izrael-haboru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><i data-path-to-node=\"4\" data-index-in-node=\"17\">Neokohn<\/i><\/a> \u2013 a newspaper representing right-wing, pro-Israel narratives \u2013 reported on its front page about a \u201eshocking UN report\u201d documenting war crimes, torture, and executions committed by Hamas. The tone of the article is admiring, and it presents the source\u2014the UN\u2014as credible and important.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"5\">That in itself would be fine, since the facts regarding Hamas\u2019s brutality must be documented. However, browsing through the publication\u2019s archives reveals a very different picture: the same media outlet has previously described the UN as \u201eanti-Israel,\u201d \u201ebiased,\u201d or even a \u201emouthpiece for terrorists\u201d whenever the organization criticized the Israeli government\u2019s settlement policy or the humanitarian situation in Gaza.<\/p>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"6\">The pitfall of selective credibility (cherry-picking)<\/h3>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"7\">This phenomenon is not unique, nor is it limited to this particular publication\u2014it is one of the most fundamental tools of manipulation in modern political media. The mechanism is simple:<\/p>\n<ol start=\"1\" data-path-to-node=\"8\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"8,0,0\"><b data-path-to-node=\"8,0,0\" data-index-in-node=\"0\">Delegitimizing the source:<\/b> When the UN reports facts (such as violations of international law) that undermine the narrative we have constructed, we label the source as \u201ebiased\u201d and \u201epolitically motivated.\u201d This allows us to avoid having to engage with the content.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"8,1,0\"><b data-path-to-node=\"8,1,0\" data-index-in-node=\"0\">The sudden canonization of the source:<\/b> When that same organization says something that confirms our preconceptions, our doubts suddenly vanish. The \u201eassociation\u201d instantly becomes the very embodiment of objectivity.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"9\">Why is this dangerous?<\/h3>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"10\">Such editorial practices serve not to inform, but to reinforce the readers\u201e \u201dcamps.\u201d The reader learns: <b data-path-to-node=\"10\" data-index-in-node=\"126\">It is not the facts that matter, but the political bias of the source.<\/b> This mindset stifles critical thinking.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"11\">For if the UN is \u201elegitimate\u201d only when it favors Israel, then documenting Hamas\u2019s crimes becomes merely a political weapon rather than an objective commitment to alleviating human suffering.<\/p>\n<h3 data-path-to-node=\"12\">Anti-propaganda perspective: Facts are not partisan<\/h3>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"13\">The <i data-path-to-node=\"13\" data-index-in-node=\"3\">Anti-propaganda<\/i> As a reader, the question isn\u2019t whether \u201ethe UN is likable.\u201d The question is why we let the media tell us in advance when we should believe an international organization and when we should dismiss it as a lie.<\/p>\n<ul data-path-to-node=\"14\">\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"14,0,0\">If Hamas\u2019s use of torture is a fact, it is a fact because the UN Commission of Inquiry documented it.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"14,1,0\">If the policy of illegal settlement is a fact, it is also a fact that it is supported by international legal documents.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"15\">Exposing this double standard is key here: let\u2019s not fall for narratives that divide the world into \u201egood\u201d and \u201ebad\u201d based on the media\u2019s whims of the moment. When a newspaper writes that the UN is \u201eshocking,\u201d even though two weeks ago it called it a \u201eclub,\u201d that\u2019s not journalism\u2014it\u2019s political acrobatics.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"16\"><b data-path-to-node=\"16\" data-index-in-node=\"0\">The lesson is simple: if a source\u2019s credibility depends on who its message is directed at, then its purpose is not to show us reality, but to impose its own version of the truth on us. Let\u2019s stay vigilant and not let selective references mislead us.<\/b><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amikor egy nemzetk\u00f6zi szervezet jelent\u00e9se kij\u00f6n, a sajt\u00f3term\u00e9kek k\u00e9tf\u00e9lek\u00e9ppen reag\u00e1lnak: vagy a \u201enemzetk\u00f6zi jog gy\u0151zelmek\u00e9nt\u201d \u00fcnneplik, vagy \u201eelfogult gittegyletk\u00e9nt\u201d b\u00e9lyegzik meg. A d\u00f6nt\u0151 t\u00e9nyez\u0151 azonban ritk\u00e1n a jelent\u00e9s tartalma, sokkal ink\u00e1bb az, hogy kinek az \u00e9rdekeit szolg\u00e1lja. \u00cdgy v\u00e1lik az ENSZ egyik napr\u00f3l a m\u00e1sikra az \u00f6rd\u00f6gt\u0151l val\u00f3 int\u00e9zm\u00e9nyb\u0151l a hiteles igazs\u00e1gmond\u00f3k sz\u00e9khely\u00e9v\u00e9. A k\u00f6zelm\u00faltban [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2613,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rs_blank_template":"","rs_page_bg_color":"","slide_template_v7":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"wpai_generated_summary":"","tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-hasbara-magyarorszagon","category-neokohn-leleplezo"],"modified_by":"Antipropaganda H\u00edrblog","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2612"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2612\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2613"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/antipropaganda.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}